LCC report on night cycling safety challenges New LCC report finds nearly a quarter of entire TfL Cycle Network unsafe after dark

New LCC report finds nearly a quarter of entire TfL Cycle Network unsafe after dark

“London Cycling Campaign (LCC) Women’s Network study of TfL’s cycle network shows that 24% is routed through isolated or unlit places such as parks that feel unsafe after dark, especially for women.”

That’s the finding of a new LCC Women’s Network report launching today, “Women’s Freedom After Dark: Are TfL’s Cycleways safe for everyone, 24/7?”

Here, BikeBiz shares details from the LCC press release, publicising the report, and its findings.

The report shows a high proportion of TfL’s Cycleways are ‘socially unsafe’ outside of daylight hours, i.e. there is a risk of harm from others, due to factors like isolation, poor lighting and a lack of escape routes.

LCC’s Women’s Network volunteers have assessed and mapped the whole of TfL’s current Cycleway network against rigorous criteria on social safety. Studies suggest that women’s journeys are disproportionately affected.

Findings include:

  • 24% of the whole TfL cycle network is socially unsafe after dark
  • 58% of TfL Cycleways have at least one socially unsafe section after dark
  • 7 Cycleways are 100% socially unsafe after dark
  • 11 Cycleways are at least 70% socially unsafe after dark

The full report is available to download from the London Cycling Campaign website.

Women stop cycling after dark in London.

The new LCC Women’s Network report follows a year on from its initial survey and report “What Stops Women Cycling In London?” which found one in three women who currently cycle in London stop during winter months or after dark due to a lack of safe routes.

Over half said they were faced with an impossible choice between cycle routes that go through isolated places where they feel at risk, or riding on hostile main roads with no protected space for cycling.

TfL’s Cycleways quality criteria not good enough

TfL’s Cycleways are their ‘high-quality’ and ‘strategic’ routes that they sign, pay for and often deliver – these routes are the core London cycle network and are vital for delivering the Mayor of London and TfL’s transport strategy on cycling for London.

They have to meet a minimum standard, assessed by TfL’s Cycle Route Quality Criteria tool – but that tool does not include any criteria on directness of route or social isolation.

As a result, councils and TfL have been building and signing routes away from main roads because it is politically convenient, but the result has seen an increasing number of Cycleway routes designed, delivered and signed into the network that simply aren’t suitable for and available for women to cycle on during the winter and after dark.

Report recommendations

As a result, the LCC Women’s Network, a coalition of individual women and organisations focusing on women cycling in London, are calling for the following from the Mayor, TfL, and others:

1. TfL should add ‘social safety’ and ‘directness’ to its Cycle Route Quality Criteria, ruling out poorly lit, isolated areas and convoluted, indirect routes.

2. TfL should urgently bring all current Cycleways up to the new quality criteria standard. Sections of existing routes, or entire routes, should be upgraded or rerouted.

3. TfL should not approve or fund council delivery of routes that do not meet the updated criteria. Leisure routes in parks are a valuable resource but should not count or be funded as part of TfL’s core cycle network.

4. TfL, councils and the police should also make leisure routes safer, with more CCTV and lighting in places like underpasses, particularly at crime ‘hotspots’.

5. TfL (and Active Travel England) should develop new guidance on cycle infrastructure and social safety. Dutch designs of underpasses could be adopted that are far more welcoming.

Kate Bartlett, LCC Women’s Network comments: “Half of all Cycleway routes have sections which aren’t usable by most women after dark, which add up to a quarter of the entire length of the cycle network. Women make only a third of all cycle journeys in London – they make over half of all cycled journeys in the Netherlands. Until London has a truly safe inclusive network designed for everyone, we’ll lag behind.”

Professor Rachel Aldred, Active Travel Academy, University of Westminster notes: “Our research has found that for women and older people, longer and more indirect routes act as more of a barrier to cycling, than they do for men and younger people. This highlights the importance of having safe and direct routes, for instance through protected space from A to B on main roads, in broadening access to cycling.”

“As London’s leading sustainable shared e-bike provider, Forest understands the importance of safe and sociable accessibility to ensure these schemes are as equitable as possible. Forest stands by the findings of the study and supports LCC’s Women’s Network calls for more inclusive planning of cycle routes and parking infrastructure. Women ride with Forest more regularly than the national average for private cyclists, but to achieve parity, these recommendations must be introduced.” – Alex Berwin, Head of Policy at Forest

“Our lights and accessories help power women cyclists through the night across the UK. But women out cycling for sport, leisure or to just get from A to B shouldn’t have to choose their routes carefully knowing that all too often the signs for London’s cycle network can lead to places they do not want to go. That’s why we support this new and vital report from LCC Women’s Network.” – Kellie Parsons, Madison cycle parts and accessories

The report features five case study route segments, some of the worst examples in London.

Case studies include Cycleway 1 which passes next to Millwall Stadium alongside an isolated railway line where muggings and bikejackings have been reported; the Grand Union Canal Cycleway, which has enabled TfL and five west London boroughs to avoid delivering a more inclusive alternative; and a crime-ridden and isolated underpass in Enfield which is used when a far more inclusive crossing of the major North Circular road is clearly needed for pedestrians and those cycling.

LCC Women’s Network and sponsors

London Cycling Campaign (LCC) is a charity with more than 20,000 supporters, of whom more than 11,000 are fully paid-up members. We speak up on behalf of everyone who cycles or wants to cycle in Greater London; and we speak up for a greener, healthier, happier and better-connected capital.

The LCC Women’s Network is run by a steering group of volunteers and has hundreds of active members, nearly 2,000 supporters and 11 associate member organisations who want London to be a city where all women, non-binary and gender non-conforming people feel safe to cycle.

The Freedom After Dark report is kindly supported by Forest, the shared e-bike service, and Madison, the UK’s leading distributor of cycle parts and accessories.

In other news...

Bike Workshop filled with bike tools on a backboard

The top 5 jobs in the bike trade this week – 25th July

The BikeBiz jobs board helped fill more than 680 positions in 2024, and listings are …